SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Najpopularniejsze domeny dla Twojej firmy w nazwa.pl (reklama)
Myślisz o zdobyciu zagranicznych rynków? Chcesz mieć adresy WWW w najbardziej rozpoznawalnych domenach? A może chciałbyś zabezpieczyć swoją markę przed wykorzystaniem jej przez kogoś innego? Powinieneś więc rozważyć rejestrację firmowych adresów WWW zawierających najpopularniejsze rozszerzenia używane na świecie.

 

198929764230_534660007817Josef Bacik
This patch removes the pinned_mutex. The extent io map has an internal tree lock that protects the tree itself, and since we only copy the extent io map when we are committing the transaction we don

 
180925294409_568760007493Josef Bacik
This patch removes the pinned_mutex. The extent io map has an internal tree lock that protects the tree itself, and since we only copy the extent io map when we are committing the transaction we don

 
167325764115_552360007068CSights
This patch cleans up the free space cache code a bit. It better documents the idiosyncrasies of tree_search_offset and makes the code make a bit more sense. I took out the info allocation at the sta

 
196929034921_593260007242CSights
This patch cleans up the free space cache code a bit. It better documents the idiosyncrasies of tree_search_offset and makes the code make a bit more sense. I took out the info allocation at the sta

 
156722554792_547260007427Chris Mason

 
126425574403_549560007061Chris Mason

 
131127124590_572160007797Chris Mason
This is true, cp makes a full copy of the file. The btrfs utilities include a program called bcp that makes a COW copy of a single file (or directory tree) with a btrfs specific ioctl. Okay,

 
121320714373_532960007322Chris Mason
This is true, cp makes a full copy of the file. The btrfs utilities include a program called bcp that makes a COW copy of a single file (or directory tree) with a btrfs specific ioctl. Okay,

 
139825634224_531860007031Chris Mason
Hi everyone, Here is an expanded example which is how I imagined COW would handle changes to the files data ("file contents"). One can pretend it is an attempt to inject mali

 
156020614287_535160007857Dmitri Nikulin
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:35 AM, CSights <csights@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi everyone,        Im curious what would happen in btrfs if the following commands were issued: #

 
177927994413_518260007317Luca Bruno
There are still some warnings of the form: format %llu expects type long long unsigned int but argument has type u64 In conjunction with -Werror, this is causing some build failures. Now theyre pro

 
124326054028_583460007428Chris Mason
Hello, recently I installed a distribution I want to look at via chroot into a btrfs subvolume on a multidevice btrfs. Now I tried to boot this, the kernel command line in GRUB looks as follows so

 
163025384499_500360007093Chris Mason

 
132522654657_555060007151Chris Mason

 
158221434213_587060007747Chris Mason

 
172622744545_513960007838Chris Mason

 
145627004442_548560007768Aaron Straus
If were waiting for a transaction to end, and it started more than five minutes ago, emit a warning. Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 1 + 1 files chang

 
191321634305_541160007172David John
Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/tree-log

 
150524924438_516260007021Oliver Mattos
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:16 AM, David John <davidjonx@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Stoyan Gaydarov wrote: Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx ---  fs/btrfs/ctree.c  

 
131326244164_552660007660Hugo Mills
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 00:10 -0500, Stoyan Gaydarov wrote: Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <stoyboyker@xxxxxxxxx --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |

 
127322184934_581860007390Chris Mason
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:31:41AM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote: After an online resize, the filesystem reports its new size, but still runs out of space at the old size: [...] Unmounting and

 
165628154090_509860007624Jens Axboe
I tried applying this patch, but the fragmentation_percent function is giving me: WARNING: "__udivdi3" [/home/partition6/yien/git/linux-git/fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined! when I compile, a

 
186622114787_517160007955Simon Holm ThxF8gers
Thanks Jens! My research had indicated something about 64-bit division and using do_div, but you cleared it up for me. The fragmentation_percent function ultimately does another divide to get the p

 
134421284446_578260007488Josef Bacik

 
180326044111_596860007604Josef Bacik

 
162724034823_556160007181Josef Bacik
This patch improves the allocators packing ability to greatly improve cold-cache reads. Instead of handling the empty_size logic within find_free_extent, we simply pass it to btrfs_find_free_space,

 
195128774996_504160007295Josef Bacik
Last night, this event jammed up a good chunk of my server: Mar 4 01:51:36 vlad kernel: btrfs searching for 1716224 bytes, num_bytes 1716224, loop 2, allowed_alloc 1 Mar 4 01:51:36 vlad kernel:

 
166528414507_545260007129Yien Zheng
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:50:53PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:06:19PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote: Last night, this event jammed up a good chunk of my server:

 
140623564257_585260007548Dmitri Nikulin
I just tried umounting the partition and got this: [ 1395.028651] btrfs searching for 69632 bytes, num_bytes 69632, loop 2, allowed_alloc 1 [ 1395.028661] btrfs allocation failed flags 1, wanted 696

 
134029404152_545160007282Hugo Mills
This is just a hunch, but maybe the handling of spare files (such as .vdi) is not ideal or not what were used to with extN. Normally "skipped" blocks do not count towards the disk f

 
105525344685_587960007906Jan Engelhardt
This patch lets each root keep track of a small area of contigous space from which to allocate from in order to keep blocks for different roots interleaving themselves on disk. This happens in two p

 
106020464783_505560007758Jan Engelhardt
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:09:38AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Hi, The following oops was obtained by doing some copying; its tainted-P by nvidia but maybe it still gives some hints.

 
135127524598_585860007610Jan Engelhardt
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:11:06PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Tuesday 2009-03-03 16:40, Josef Bacik wrote: The following oops was obtained by doing some copying; its tainted-P by

 
198826094966_524560007103Peter Vander Klippe
Hi, I just wanted to inform you all that Ive built btrfs packages for ubuntu (intrepid). You can find them in my PPA ( rel="nofollow" launchpad.net/~brcha/+archive/ppa launchpad.net/~brcha/+a

 
179328024042_594560007951Marc Schoechlin
Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) ## Test environment: - IBM System z900 Mainframe - Debian SID with 64 Bit Kernel - GIT Sourc

 
122723084484_591260007580Marc Schoechlin
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:16 +0100, Marc Schoechlin wrote: Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) Thanks, Ill try to repro

 
181822474626_560060007713Josef Bacik
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:36:08PM +0100, Marc Schoechlin (linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: [ 359.658789] btrfs allocation failed flags 68, wanted 4096 [ 359.659966] space_info has 932491264

 
135726544464_595660007668Lee Trager
Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took out the delayed unlink code, it wasnt making a big enough difference in any benchmarks to justify

 
156524994277_553160007738Lee Trager
Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took out the delayed unlink code, it wasnt making a big enough difference in any benchmarks to justify

 
163425364539_567760007792Lee Trager

 
162727084100_511160007287Lee Trager

 
169124384535_531660007838Steven Pratt

 
102823964491_549360007002Steven Pratt

 
116029174502_543860007245Steven Pratt
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:54 -0600, Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took

 
117520814782_571560007262Steven Pratt
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 22:07:33 Steven Pratt escribió: All in all good progress. Results and graphs can be found here: rel="nofollow" btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/h

 
150723854971_560760007591Steven Pratt
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:54 -0600, Steven Pratt wrote: Chris Mason wrote: Hello everyone, Ive rebased the experimental branch again with my latest performance fixes. I took

 
189521874028_542960007066Chris Ball
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 23:55:08 Steven Pratt escribió: Unless I am missing something, what you are referring to is a simple wraping/alignment issue in the key on the long name

 
126625324462_575860007814Steven Pratt
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 22:07:33 Steven Pratt escribió: All in all good progress. Results and graphs can be found here: rel="nofollow" btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/h

 
176121864730_526260007177Yan Zheng
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:13:10PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, This patch (against experimental HEAD) attempts to make shrinking more robust, by only updating device size if weve succeeded

 
150728004259_528960007017Chris Ball
On Miércoles 25 Febrero 2009 23:55:08 Steven Pratt escribió: Unless I am missing something, what you are referring to is a simple wraping/alignment issue in the key on the long name

 

 

home   |    register   |    login