SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Nie podał hasła, trafił za kratki
W ten sposób brytyjski sąd chce zmusić nastolatka do podania hasła szyfrującego jego komputer. Sprawa jest poważna, dotyczy bowiem seksualnego wykorzystywania dzieci.

 

158023554449_536360007695Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, sorry for my late answering - I was out for a few days. Since I do not have full insigight to neither the driver nor the internal connections of the board I need to guess. maybe the dri

 
164223124005_551760007412Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
194020084273_599860007147Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
125425844822_545560007225Jean Delvare
The gkrellm package in Fedora Extras 6 has been patched to use libsensors. This causes it to fail to detect the voltage sensors on my Abit VP6 motherboard: [pilcher at home ~]$ gkrellm -d 0x80 ---

 
109621864643_528760007470Jean Delvare
Jean Delvare wrote: This is a bug in Fedora and/or gkrellm. What do you expect from us by reporting it on the lm_sensors list? I guess it would be a bug in gkrellm, since its making the assumpti

 
192827934825_537660007962DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
107127984274_507760007403Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
148922544411_576360007615DJ Barrow
Collected by a colleague of mine at work. may be useful in constructing a readme. /home/mmm/help/snmp #--ucdsnmp now known as net-snmp (5.) rel="nofollow" www.net-snmp.org/ www.net-snmp.org/

 
191025064199_573260007663Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
195720574849_559960007062Jean Delvare
Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2.10.1 so that they work with kernels such as "2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp" as distributed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? Fo

 
106922724856_589460007011Mark M Hoffman
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
185627214810_512960007124Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
153222874378_594460007630Axel Thimm
The kernel as distributed by Red Hat in RHEL4 update 4 (2.6.9-42.0.3) has got an lm_sensors and i2c in there already but it is a very old version, 2.8.7. That is not new enough to sup

 
155929594135_575860007096Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
142126474154_527060007500Axel Thimm
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jean Delvare wrote: Hi Steven, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:59:20 -0500 (CDT), Steven Timm wrote: Has anyone successfully managed to compile i2c 2.10.1 and lm_sensors 2

 
133323154773_518860007422Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
120020644142_500960007940Jean Delvare
J. Barons latest patch still reflects a pre-2.9.x version of lm_sensors as far as I can tell. I will try to open a ticket with Red Hat on this. Thanks Steve Timm On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Axel Thimm

 
113427264227_551260007276Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
114222284235_527860007926Jean Delvare
Is the w83792d chip one of those supported in the newer 2.6 kernels? thats the main one I need that the current redhat distro kernel doesnt have. Also, which version of the Linus 2.6 kernel tree sh

 
137524084573_552960007820Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
102920114135_580260007344Stephen Cormier
Hi, make in lm_sensors-2.10.1 stops running with this error: make: *** No rule to make target `mach_mpspec.h, needed by `kernel/chips/xeontemp.d. Stop. What am I doing wrong? Bye - Ingo.

 
122324004409_536660007603James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
130525444328_553260007999James Olin Oden
Hi Mark/Eric & others, I am looking at backporting the lm93 driver ( lm93-driver-2.6.13-rc3-mm3-0001.bin ) to Linux version 2.6.9-34 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 to meet a customer requirement. T

 
180921984227_504360007213Udo van den Heuvel
On 10/23/06, James Olin Oden <james.oden at gmail.com wrote: I do believe we already have a patch where I work. Ill send it to the list in a moment. In need to hunt it down. If we dont hav

 
197028514622_554360007300Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1 for w83627hf to make my fans start again after booting the kernel on VIA Epia EK8000.

 
136224094312_549760007512Udo van den Heuvel
Hi Udo, On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:32:30 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Jean Delvare wrote: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:26:20 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I report that I have to use reset=1

 
184224344912_525160007322Roy Erickson
Jean Delvare wrote: If "sensors -s" is run as part of your init scripts, please remove it and check again, Id like to get it out of the list of suspects. $PSENSORS -s is in the lm_s

 
185421054866_518260007922Yongkui Han
Hello Roy, Please use the more decent subject. IM NOT SHOUTHING AT YOU too. Best would be to install the lmsensors package from your distribution. Become root. Run sensors-detect script which will d

 
118024474120_540760007596Message not availabl
Hi, I have an Intel D850MV motherboard. There is an ADM1025A sensor chip on the motherboard. Also there is an LPC47M142 I/O chip on the motherboard. My CPU is a Pentium 4 CPU, 1.7GHz. And her

 
162124604447_524360007828Yongkui Han
Hi Yongkui, Thanks very much for your help. Well always good to hear it. Unfortunately I have not so much free time recently for this kind of lm-sensors support stuff. The pin numbers for the

 
154423654237_585660007448Rudolf Marek
Hi Rudolf, I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU temp". It is about 20 seconds. In my opinion, the time constant of the silicon chip is about 10 millisecon

 
136727044883_527960007683Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Thank you for your reply. On 10/23/06, Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz wrote: Hi Yongkui I calculated the time constant based on the temperature curve of "CPU

 
160128094789_546760007427Yongkui Han
Hi Rudolf, Forgot to include the attachment. Please check the attachment. Thank you! Yongkui On 10/25/06, Yongkui Han <hanyongkui99 at gmail.com wrote: Hi Rudolf, I drew the curve of

 
138921704874_550960007364Yongkui Han
I run the CPU burn benchmark for only 1 minute (plus 15 minutes system idle before running cpuburn, and 15 minutes system idle after cpuburn stops running), I even got the following message w

 
110521994825_555360007827Paul Aviles
Hello, I just installed a VIA Epia EK8000 board. It has w83697hf sensor chip, detected by sensors-detect. Temperature readings are high and do not move. Also changing set tempX Y to change diode, th

 
138029864191_561760007053Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:18:21 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: I have a weird question. The system I use are all the same, and one of them is really quiet and the others are somewhat louder in

 
106522094758_594960007713Paul Aviles
Hi Paul, On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:31:55 -0400, Paul Aviles wrote: Nice server.... [root at srv1 /]# sensors adt7463-i2c-0-2e Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 1480 ERROR: Cant get alarm mask da

 
163120894521_542060007511Rudolf Marek
Is this combination one of the ones thats not yet available? sensors-detect seems to work, but sensors says it cant find anything. Heres some output: [jhg at athena ~]$ lsmod|grep i2c i2c_i801

 
184729464682_572160007259Hans de Goede
Hello to the list. I have an HP Pavilion zv6069EA Laptop. Following your pages I succeeded in using i2c-piix4 with eeprom (but 1st question: what can I do now, since this is not a sensor?) and k8te

 
108525604459_591060007901Greg KH
Here are some hwmon fixes for 2.6.19-rc2. They have all been in the -mm tree for a while. Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/hwmon-2.6.git/ or from: master.ker

 
173724924887_592860007728Greg KH
From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Replace a bouncing email that I cannot recover from Mr Google. Signed-off-by: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk at gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <k

 
198221754937_573960007425Greg KH
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org The SMSC LPC47M112 Super-I/O chip appears to be compatible with the LPC47M10x and LPC47M13x as far as hardware monitoring is concerned. The device ID is

 
145227554515_597360007071Greg KH
From: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz Fix the detection of fan5 and preserve the bit between the register writes, because the bit is write only. Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek <r.marek at

 
148320214017_516460007472David Hubbard
From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org Fix debug messages in w83781d at detection time. We cant use dev_dbg() on an i2c clients device before calling i2c_attach_client() on that client. Sign

 
142428284031_588360007143Christian Mahr
Hi David, On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:01:19 -0700, David Hubbard wrote: Im doing bits and pieces of the w83627dhg driver, and I want to make sure I test it on the latest patched w83627ehf driver. I be

 
178424734635_567160007745Hamlet
Hi Christian, You have a w83627dhg, if I remember correctly. The current driver you are probably using is the testing driver from the lm-sensors mailing list in September. Although it functions corr

 
139923834921_533660007043David Hubbard
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:55:10 -0300 Hamlet <hamletmun at fibertel.com.ar wrote: Winbond W83627DHG seems to be compatible with lm78 well, no not really.. the temp you get is MB temp, the cpu te

 
176125744798_527660007973David Hubbard
The patch will be for 2.6.19-rc2 or whichever kernel is the latest version. You should probably build a new kernel, as one of the things we would like to test is whether the patch compiles correctly

 
134820284994_536560007736Message not availabl
Hi Christian, Of yourse I can also test any newer version. I understand you want to make a separate driver for the W83627DHG for some 2.6.19-RC-xx? To be exact, the driver I sent you is for 2

 
183826184563_586960007299Christian Mahr
Hi Christian, Please include lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org in your reply so this will benefit others and get archived on the LM-sensors list. On 10/29/06, Christian Mahr <christian.mahr.ulm at ar