SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
IE ma już mniej niż 50% rynku
Globalne statystyki StatCounter mówią, że udział IE w rynku przeglądarek spadł poniżej 50%. Najszybciej nowych użytkowników zdobywała przeglądarka Google Chrome. Zmiany są szczególnie widoczne w Europie, gdzie wprowadzono do Windowsa ekran wyboru przeglądarek.

 

135524924273_592660007307Thomas Gleixner

 
192625324855_549560007009Thomas Gleixner

 
125224704646_552260007803Thomas Gleixner

 
173020144617_592160007683Thomas Gleixner

 
117322024013_574060007971Thomas Gleixner

 
171326654463_598660007203Thomas Gleixner

 
129225164736_514760007122Uwe KleineKxF6nig

 
115622634592_580360007442Gaye Abdoulaye Walsi
Hi all, Can anyone have tried rt-patches on MIPS architecture ? Is RT-linux works on MIPS architecture with all features support i.e. PREEMPT_HARDIRQS, PREEMPT_SOFTIRQ, PREEMPT_RCU? Thanks, Tom --

 
160625154457_522260007401Thomas Gleixner
Hi, Could I know the current state of rt-support on MIPS arch ?  When will it be released with full MIPS support ? Currently which rt-features MIPS arch supports ? Any comments will be appreci

 
190526094604_591960007914Thomas Gleixner

 
188920604578_535160007169Thomas Gleixner
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Vivek, please do _NOT_ toppost. Thanks. On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Vivek Satpute wrote: Could I kn

 
155423384686_529060007697Uwe KleineKxF6nig

 
141226424960_500460007745Thomas Gleixner
Let me scroogle that for you... So there is activity back in the early oughts through 2.6.24 fairly recently 1. TimeSys to port Linux/RT to MIPS "News, views, articles, and discussion o

 
144620494260_590460007696Gaye Abdoulaye Walsi
Hi all, Can anyone have tried rt-patches on MIPS architecture ? Is RT-linux works on MIPS architecture with all features support i.e. PREEMPT_HARDIRQS, PREEMPT_SOFTIRQ, PREEMPT_RCU? Thanks, Tom --

 
130421774304_590960007653Thomas Gleixner
Hi, Could I know the current state of rt-support on MIPS arch ?  When will it be released with full MIPS support ? Currently which rt-features MIPS arch supports ? Any comments will be appreci

 
182229844713_540060007760SvenThorsten Dietric
Ccing linux-rt. Mabye someone has a flash of an idea. On Thursday 2009-06-04 23:42, Hector Centeno wrote to Jan Engelhardt: I hope it is OK to contact you directly to this email. Ive been try

 
156928904097_525460007583Thomas Gleixner
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Vivek, please do _NOT_ toppost. Thanks. On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Vivek Satpute wrote: Could I kn

 
195225924224_591160007669Mark Knecht
On Friday 2009-06-05 03:14, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 00:21 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Ccing linux-rt. Mabye someone has a flash of an idea. On Thursday 20

 
165620424719_591660007991Thomas Gleixner
Let me scroogle that for you... So there is activity back in the early oughts through 2.6.24 fairly recently 1. TimeSys to port Linux/RT to MIPS "News, views, articles, and discussion o

 
161122504167_591660007263SvenThorsten Dietric
Ccing linux-rt. Mabye someone has a flash of an idea. On Thursday 2009-06-04 23:42, Hector Centeno wrote to Jan Engelhardt: I hope it is OK to contact you directly to this email. Ive been try

 
156829814246_528160007582Mark Knecht
On Friday 2009-06-05 03:14, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 00:21 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Ccing linux-rt. Mabye someone has a flash of an idea. On Thursday 20

 
104029504471_513760007651Thomas Gleixner
On Friday 2009-06-05 17:07, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Friday 2009-06-05 03:14, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote: On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 00:21 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Ccing linux-rt. Mabye

 
172121544242_594660007838Message not availabl

 
161527224881_533360007827Carsten Emde

 
132422484076_549260007235Herman ten Brugge
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Herman ten Brugge<hermantenbrugge@xxxxxxx wrote: I have written some code to convert the ascii sched_switch output to vcd format (value change data). Now it is

 
175527314216_500160007597GeunSik Lim

 
158320514546_505360007750Hugo Vincent
Hi everyone, Im trying to debug a problem with GPIO interrupts on my OMAP3503 (Gumstix Overo) platform with kernel 2.6.29.4-rt16-omap1. While this is a sporadic lock-up, I havent been able to repro

 
170429114905_594660007970GeunSik Lim
On a OMAP3503 (Gumstix Overo) I see a rather nasty-looking crash early in bootup, that is triggered by CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. The same config minus CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING doesnt crash, and seems to work

 
178424704691_566560007328GeunSik Lim
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 11:06:27AM +0900, GeunSik Lim wrote: | | | Dear Clark Williams, | | Please, Fix the "debugfs/tracing" name in cyclictest.c source file. | | P.S: Now, version i

 
149121274577_556860007740GeunSik Lim
Dear Clark Williams, This is tracing directorys comment related patch files. Please, merge my patch. Regards, GeunSik Lim. Subject: [PATCH V2] cyclictest: Fix invalid comment of debugfs m

 
180423744471_501960007483GeunSik Lim
Hi, On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:52:09AM +0900, GeunSik Lim wrote: Dear Clark Williams, This is tracing(ftrace) directorys comment related patch file. Please, merge this patch. Re

 
161629584535_516260007725Clark Williams
This was noticed by GeunSik Lim. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: GeunSik Lim <leemgs1@xxxxxxxxx Cc: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lclaudio@xxxxxxxx

 
191227154635_581660007491Jan Blunck
Moving of IRQs is done in hardirq context so the sparse_irq_lock needs to be raw_spinlock_t. For this to work we need to move the memory allocation before actually taking the lock itself. This patch

 
178624454961_547760007765Tim Shepard
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Jan Blunck wrote: With 2.6.29.4-rt16 I get after some time under load following warnings: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 NOHZ: local_so

 
180526004893_538260007512SvenThorsten Dietric
can anyone explain this kernel: INFO: task sirq-net-rx/0:8 blocked for more than 120 seconds. kernel: "echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. kernel: sirq

 
112129714886_559360007260Thomas Gleixner
It is a intel dual core with 2 gig of ram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordom

 
107526074218_561060007229Thomas Gleixner
2.6.28-rt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at rel="nofollow" v

 
133526804944_597060007604Message not availabl
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx --- src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c b/src/cyclic

 
146022814048_542160007157Clark Williams
Hello, My first fix didnt took into account that long is 4 byte long on ARM. Therefor I changed it to long long now, which works on my ARM board... Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx

 
118625634758_507860007926Thomas Gleixner
Somehow the following hunk was lost during the port to 2.6.29. Without it calling sysrq-t or similar gives you very strange results ;) Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx --- include/lin

 
159020664896_547560007887Robin Gareus

 
173627354493_595460007261Thomas Gleixner
Somehow the following hunk was lost during the port to 2.6.29. Without it calling sysrq-t or similar gives you very strange results ;) Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx --- include/lin

 
118326804942_512660007437Thomas Gleixner

 
173121094719_578060007476Robin Gareus

 
193827174039_569560007984Thomas Gleixner

 
162023854050_551660007710Udo van den Heuvel

 
140325974445_589660007790Udo van den Heuvel
The same case, [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.29.4-rt15 (root@tid31) (gcc version 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.

 
115727344470_509860007119Leon Woestenberg

 
153625914229_525460007760Paul E McKenney

 
173123084477_577060007272nourry
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: In theory, one could analyze the Linux kernel to identify the longest section of code running with preempt

 

 

home   |    register   |    login