SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:27
Nobel z fizyki za przełomowy materiał (wideo)
Szybsze komputery i przejrzyste ekrany dotykowe mogą pojawić się na rynku dzięki grafenowi. Jest to supermocny, cienki materiał odkryty w roku 2004. Wczoraj nagrodę Nobla z fizyki otrzymali Andriej Gejm i Konstantin Nowosiołow za przełomowe eksperymenty związane z grafenem.

 

148026414932_564760007440Sevrin Robstad

 
138821864742_567660007489Message not availabl

 
178826784119_550660007308Molle Bestefich

 
165326934875_529260007272Francois Barre
On Monday July 17, quackyo@xxxxxxxx wrote: I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it upnrunning again I did

 
162520594051_503160007684Francois Barre

 
144126364325_537360007125Tuomas Leikola

 
181326704312_555460007809Jeff Breidenbach

 
104321334486_516260007610Jeff Breidenbach

 
147022914302_534560007005Bill Davidsen

 
161722084064_566860007219Neil Brown
Hi all, I have a RAID6 array where a disk went bad. I removed the old disk, put in an identical one, and repartitioned the new disk. I am now trying to add the new partition to the array, but I

 
135226814855_567860007137Neil Brown
Thanks for the reply, Neil. Here is my version: [root@paul log]# mdadm --version mdadm - v2.3.1 - 6 February 2006 This is a somewhat production system, running Fedora Core 5. Official packages co

 
180428674808_511560007153Neil Brown
Please, please! I am dead in the water! To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 system, using /dev/hd[acdeg] 2 and /dev/sd[ab]2. /dev/hdd went bad so I replaced the drive and tried to ad

 
192424644286_540960007926Paul Waldo
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:25, Neil Brown wrote: On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Please, please! I am dead in the water! To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5

 
101920974217_532160007800Paul Waldo
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: At this point, Id just be happy to be able to get the degraded array back up and running. Is there any way to do that? Thanks! mdadm --as

 
132620584008_539160007248Paul Waldo

 
161120794930_546660007984Paul Waldo

 
160325604851_541160007271Dan Graham
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Here is the dmesg output. No log files are created with the FC5 rescue disk. Thanks! On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:59, Neil Brown wrote:

 
156425994735_585160007362Paul Clements
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dan Graham wrote: Hello; I have an existing, active ext3 filesystem which I would like to convert to a RAID 1 ext3 filesystem with minimal down time. After casting about

 
177720264459_599460007901Robert Heinzmann
Paul Clements wrote: Is 16 blocks a large enough area? Maybe. The superblock will be between 64KB and 128KB from the end of the partition. This depends on the size of the partition:

 
179326754960_580260007686Paul Waldo
Still no joy after zeroing the superblock, Mikael. :-( [root@paul ~]# mdadm --examine /dev/hdd2 /dev/hdd2: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : 2e316d9e:20cac82a

 
104926774765_597960007522Neil Brown
Hi i have small problem when i booting i have md1 as /boot md2 as swap and md3 as / (root) and when it come to md3 it say something like "md3 has no identity information" i cant read it

 
196327464082_581360007757linuxmania lizhi
A client of mine desperately wants a Dell solution rather than a self-build. They are looking at an external Dell box with 15 x 500GB SATA drives in it and a Dell 1U host controller - but the connec

 
108327214355_581960007363linuxmania lizhi
On Thursday July 13, linuxmania.lizhi@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi all, Im new to MD RAID. When I read the book "Understanding the Linux Kernel", I know that there are several layers between Fil

 
118023484390_564060007739Gordon Henderson
Last year, there were discussions on this list about the possible use of a co-processor (Intels IOP333) to compute raid 5/6s parity data. We are about to see low cost, multi core cpu chips with very

 
154021344413_550060007480Burn Alting

 
118629854156_595160007299Andrew Skolarz

 
147329274045_555560007201Andrew Skolarz

 
131228234923_566860007495Andrew Skolarz
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 06:10 schrieben Sie: Care to enlighten the rest of us what did the trick? Dex please disregard this email .. after doing more google research i have re-assembled the

 
103028224843_542060007184Justin Piszcz
On Tuesday July 11, pletopia@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Checksum : 4aa9094a - expected 4aa908c4 This is a bit scary. You have a single-bit error, either in the checksum or elsewhere in the superbloc

 
115920014318_557260007253Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Neil, It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l? Is t

 
105226874238_520860007202Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Neil, It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l? Is t

 
150821104128_555360007868David Greaves

 
175529784690_567860007331David Greaves

 
117226764152_501460007614Vladimir Strycek
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL? GPL. Ill make that

 
119822554616_551660007116Vladimir Strycek
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL? GPL. Ill make that

 
177028804804_500860007441Mario BitKoenig Holb
Hello Vladimir, Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote: VS Hi, VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical VS 200GB hdd VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks

 
121025964552_533960007217Mario BitKoenig Holb
Hello Vladimir, Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote: VS Hi, VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical VS 200GB hdd VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks

 
120629044195_589760007841Neil Brown

 
122727534516_538060007612Tejun Heo

 
199529664867_561060007694Bill Davidsen
On Tuesday July 11, htejun@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Christian Pernegger wrote: The fact that the disk had changed minor numbers after it was plugged back in bugs me a bit. (was sdc before, sde afte

 
172622524573_552960007661Justin Piszcz

 
197124714257_552260007406Justin Piszcz

 
174020174309_593560007890Christian Pernegger

 
177621414643_529160007410Molle Bestefich
Hi! I created a sw-raid md0 and a LVM above with four 250GB Samsung SATA disks a couple of months ago. I am not an raid expert but I thought I could handle it with a little help of my friends from g

 
190325154375_576960007858Henrik Holst
Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich <at gmail.com writes: From the paste bin: 443: root <at ned ~ # mdadm --examine /dev/sd[abcd] Shows that all 4 devices are ACTIVE SYNC....

 
146328514109_503660007370Karl Voit
Henrik Holst <henrik.holst <at idgmail.se writes: Karl Voit wrote: [snip] Well this is because of the false(?) superblocks of sda-sdd in comparison to sda1 to sdd1. I dont

 
169823514842_595560007652Karl Voit

 
136026134669_567060007583Karl Voit

 
156023234724_520260007244Karl Voit

 
161225174760_598860007885Karl Voit

 

 

home   |    register   |    login