SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
OnetVOD: filmy i seriale w pakiecie VODmax
Onet VOD wprowadził pakiet VODmax, który umożliwia nieograniczony dostęp do ponad 200 godzin płatnych materiałów wideo o charakterze premium dostępnych w serwisie: amerykańskich seriali z wytwórni Warner Bros, polskich produkcji, w tym prapremier seriali TVN oraz kilkudziesięciu filmów fabularnych.

 

194627944263_533160007636Sevrin Robstad

 
144822614356_515060007510Message not availabl

 
115723224057_563760007651Molle Bestefich

 
174325634647_517360007161Francois Barre
On Monday July 17, quackyo@xxxxxxxx wrote: I have written some posts about this before... My 6 disk RAID 5 broke down because of hardware failure. When I tried to get it upnrunning again I did

 
136229734628_588860007779Francois Barre

 
131028024573_557360007939Tuomas Leikola

 
120925804200_556560007115Jeff Breidenbach

 
107528884437_513260007394Jeff Breidenbach

 
178422674958_543060007271Bill Davidsen

 
159228034243_521960007099Neil Brown
Hi all, I have a RAID6 array where a disk went bad. I removed the old disk, put in an identical one, and repartitioned the new disk. I am now trying to add the new partition to the array, but I

 
199820004901_557060007033Neil Brown
Thanks for the reply, Neil. Here is my version: [root@paul log]# mdadm --version mdadm - v2.3.1 - 6 February 2006 This is a somewhat production system, running Fedora Core 5. Official packages co

 
150927834614_571060007344Neil Brown
Please, please! I am dead in the water! To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5 system, using /dev/hd[acdeg] 2 and /dev/sd[ab]2. /dev/hdd went bad so I replaced the drive and tried to ad

 
182524234232_526260007757Paul Waldo
On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:25, Neil Brown wrote: On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Please, please! I am dead in the water! To recap, I have a RAID6 array on a Fedora Core 5

 
165723394024_561460007465Paul Waldo
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: At this point, Id just be happy to be able to get the degraded array back up and running. Is there any way to do that? Thanks! mdadm --as

 
188523614268_512760007959Paul Waldo

 
122725794960_512760007534Paul Waldo

 
116126594316_577560007664Dan Graham
On Sunday July 23, pwaldo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Here is the dmesg output. No log files are created with the FC5 rescue disk. Thanks! On Sunday 23 July 2006 07:59, Neil Brown wrote:

 
111921934087_535160007643Paul Clements
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dan Graham wrote: Hello; I have an existing, active ext3 filesystem which I would like to convert to a RAID 1 ext3 filesystem with minimal down time. After casting about

 
110821114982_513260007751Robert Heinzmann
Paul Clements wrote: Is 16 blocks a large enough area? Maybe. The superblock will be between 64KB and 128KB from the end of the partition. This depends on the size of the partition:

 
159826104112_586660007694Paul Waldo
Still no joy after zeroing the superblock, Mikael. :-( [root@paul ~]# mdadm --examine /dev/hdd2 /dev/hdd2: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.00 UUID : 2e316d9e:20cac82a

 
182529644272_578460007422Neil Brown
Hi i have small problem when i booting i have md1 as /boot md2 as swap and md3 as / (root) and when it come to md3 it say something like "md3 has no identity information" i cant read it

 
131722524080_563460007449linuxmania lizhi
A client of mine desperately wants a Dell solution rather than a self-build. They are looking at an external Dell box with 15 x 500GB SATA drives in it and a Dell 1U host controller - but the connec

 
129821464642_538660007096linuxmania lizhi
On Thursday July 13, linuxmania.lizhi@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi all, Im new to MD RAID. When I read the book "Understanding the Linux Kernel", I know that there are several layers between Fil

 
102826064207_501060007933Gordon Henderson
Last year, there were discussions on this list about the possible use of a co-processor (Intels IOP333) to compute raid 5/6s parity data. We are about to see low cost, multi core cpu chips with very

 
176223364542_587560007279Burn Alting

 
156820264243_584160007335Andrew Skolarz

 
126221284588_534360007615Andrew Skolarz

 
179220604762_543360007259Andrew Skolarz
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 06:10 schrieben Sie: Care to enlighten the rest of us what did the trick? Dex please disregard this email .. after doing more google research i have re-assembled the

 
153024754866_573860007603Justin Piszcz
On Tuesday July 11, pletopia@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Checksum : 4aa9094a - expected 4aa908c4 This is a bit scary. You have a single-bit error, either in the checksum or elsewhere in the superbloc

 
167022474939_521260007140Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Neil, It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l? Is t

 
149226904166_573560007978Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday July 11, jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Neil, It worked, echoing the 600 to the stripe width in /sys, however, how come /dev/md3 says it is 0 MB when I type fdisk -l? Is t

 
106927924105_565860007867David Greaves

 
127329274928_503460007374David Greaves

 
129428904849_515960007334Vladimir Strycek
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL? GPL. Ill make that

 
176322964582_570260007703Vladimir Strycek
On Tuesday July 11, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Horrid stuff but important to many. Speaking of which, Neil, if you read this - are the man pages under the GFDL or the GPL? GPL. Ill make that

 
184320004392_500860007923Mario BitKoenig Holb
Hello Vladimir, Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote: VS Hi, VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical VS 200GB hdd VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks

 
198628054715_509160007850Mario BitKoenig Holb
Hello Vladimir, Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 11:41:31 AM, you wrote: VS Hi, VS I created to 3 x /dev/md1 to /dev/md3 which consist of six identical VS 200GB hdd VS my mdadm --detail --scan looks

 
195827364776_588660007136Neil Brown

 
125920634025_510760007652Tejun Heo

 
144229864949_502360007458Bill Davidsen
On Tuesday July 11, htejun@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Christian Pernegger wrote: The fact that the disk had changed minor numbers after it was plugged back in bugs me a bit. (was sdc before, sde afte

 
172725304458_511960007193Justin Piszcz

 
104125254999_575660007461Justin Piszcz

 
160625744196_538260007967Christian Pernegger

 
151827194030_554360007253Molle Bestefich
Hi! I created a sw-raid md0 and a LVM above with four 250GB Samsung SATA disks a couple of months ago. I am not an raid expert but I thought I could handle it with a little help of my friends from g

 
119522684239_514360007928Henrik Holst
Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich <at gmail.com writes: From the paste bin: 443: root <at ned ~ # mdadm --examine /dev/sd[abcd] Shows that all 4 devices are ACTIVE SYNC....

 
160120194457_505960007996Karl Voit
Henrik Holst <henrik.holst <at idgmail.se writes: Karl Voit wrote: [snip] Well this is because of the false(?) superblocks of sda-sdd in comparison to sda1 to sdd1. I dont

 
125221804520_525160007135Karl Voit

 
171225424710_590960007168Karl Voit

 
187524424887_590560007713Karl Voit

 
115821804982_539860007273Karl Voit

 

 

home   |    register   |    login