SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Apple zapłaci 625,5 mln USD za naruszenie patentów?
Sąd uznał winę firmy Stevea Jobsa i nakazał jej wypłatę ogromnego odszkodowania. Ta jednak uważa, że racja jest po jej stronie i zapowiada dalszą walkę.

 

123127774414_578460007034Jay Levitt
On Sunday 11 April 2004 4:56 pm, __ Radien__ wrote: No. TCPwrappers is a response mechanism to see where a connection came from, not a gateway in the middle of a connection between two mach

 
157820154776_517260007083Alistair Tonner
On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 01:38, Jay Levitt wrote: Im occasionally seeing lines like the following, always to the same machine which is on my internal network: Apr 11 01:11:52 linux kernel: Rej

 
173722524617_564160007118Alistair Tonner
On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 01:38, Jay Levitt wrote: Im occasionally seeing lines like the following, always to the same machine which is on my internal network: Apr 11 01:11:52 linux kernel: Rej

 
166724264937_576260007985Antony Stone
hi im not sure if this is the right list to ask this, dont be too harsh one me :~ this is my ipv6 routing table # route -A inet6 -n Kernel IPv6 routing table Destination

 
137322594533_533160007112Antony Stone
hi im not sure if this is the right list to ask this, dont be too harsh one me :~ this is my ipv6 routing table # route -A inet6 -n Kernel IPv6 routing table Destination

 
182427674890_523760007153Antony Stone
On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 02:54, Antony Stone wrote: Can anyone think how I can see the content of packets from a browser running on my machine, which is posting a form back to a remote server some

 
127121284168_504660007835Antony Stone
On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 02:54, Antony Stone wrote: Can anyone think how I can see the content of packets from a browser running on my machine, which is posting a form back to a remote server some

 
113020374086_574760007807Antony Stone
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 01:54:39AM +0100, Antony Stone wrote: I want to pick up a packet stream, but for an HTTPS connection, and using a standard packet sniffer like ethereal just gives me t

 
186623454232_580260007549Antony Stone
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 01:54:39AM +0100, Antony Stone wrote: I want to pick up a packet stream, but for an HTTPS connection, and using a standard packet sniffer like ethereal just gives me t

 
178724804808_532060007343Anupam
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 20:54, Antony Stone wrote: Hi people. This is not strictly a netfilter question, but Im wondering if maybe someone can help or make a suggestion? I want to pick u

 
143226354109_532160007660Anupam
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 20:54, Antony Stone wrote: Hi people. This is not strictly a netfilter question, but Im wondering if maybe someone can help or make a suggestion? I want to pick u

 
147521434788_564360007088Philipp Stader

 
147723214125_556460007804Syed Faisal Gillani
Philipp Stader wrote:

 
137029334148_560360007256Nick Pasich
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Syed Faisal Gillani wrote: i am a newbie learning iptables ... can u tell me the rule of blocking only ping on my nic ? Hi, try this: iptables -A INPUT -p icmp --icmp-typ

 
115125214737_596060007548Frederic de Villamil
is it possible in iptables to FW a port traffic (eg 80) to an internal = ipaddress of a webserver ? Syed Faisal Gillani ClickOnline Networks clickonlinenetworks.com clickonlinenetworks.com E

 
130222734183_541260007055Jee JZ
is it possible in iptables to FW a port traffic (eg 80) to an internal = ipaddress of a webserver ? Syed Faisal Gillani ClickOnline Networks clickonlinenetworks.com clickonlinenetworks.com

 
107120694199_585960007390Jee JZ
On Saturday 10 April 2004 7:54 pm, Jee J.Z. wrote: Dear all, I am trying to setup three PCs and do some simple filter+nat jobs. The situation is specified below: 1.PC1 has one NIC with a

 
194821904711_507360007779Jee JZ
On Sunday 11 April 2004 12:33 am, Jee J.Z. wrote: Hi Antony, Thanks for getting the spelling right - lots of people round here dont :) Look at the routing table of each machine the packets a

 
187721254711_502560007446Jee JZ
On Sunday 11 April 2004 3:00 am, Jee J.Z. wrote: Heres what I think is going on: PC1 has a simple routing table saying "network 144.32.xxx.0/23 is on eth0, and the deafult gatew

 
128128804967_501760007808Antony Stone

 
156621414080_575060007676Chris Brenton
It happens on many servers, not just sourceforge - in fact, I get it on the netfilter server as well. And its only sometimes for any given server, not all the time... Ill try turning on sendmail lo

 
180626254745_500460007458Ranjeet Shetye
Chris Brenton wrote: On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 14:33, Jay Levitt wrote: sourceforge: [SYN] me: [SYN, ACK] sourceforge: [ACK] [SMTP conversation ensues, switches to TLS, sends me an

 
139424304649_510560007403Antony Stone
Hi all, some of you can give me some input about the best way to set up a vpn under two Linux RH9 systems? I heared there are different solution (PPP and SSH, PPTP...) and Id like to know your opin

 
188423804528_559560007256Antony Stone
Antony Stone wrote:

 
104026874136_500660007976Antony Stone
Hi, I forget one things, waht about the CIPE solution. I read that in the rh9 sec guide about VPN. And then, I see this news: the FreeS/WAN project is no longer in active development, it could b

 
181522714116_589560007670Alexander Samad
Ok, I see. Well, thank you very much for giving me such information and for being so exhaustive. regards Gianni Antony Stone wrote:

 
157128264294_531660007778Scott MacKay
---snip---- Development has moved to openswan I believe openvpm is another good choice for ipsec vpn solution Regards, Antony. -- The difference between theo

 
177422254207_542260007711Dick StPeters
Im afraid I dont have time to answer in depth today but here are a few quick answers regarding *swan: On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 08:25, Scott MacKay wrote: I had a couple questions about the different

 
182622134091_535360007496John A Sullivan III
On Saturday 10 April 2004 11:18, Antony Stone wrote: PPP is Point-to-Point Protocol, and has almost nothing to do with VPNs :) SSH is Secure Shell, and at least it contains some encryption, but

 
161028494183_574660007888Dimitris Kounalakis
lør, 10.04.2004 kl. 14.30 skrev John A. Sullivan III: [...] The closest solution we could find to rival the commercial offerings on such a large scale is netfilter + freeS/WAN + iproute2 +

 
172126704158_583760007179azeem ahmad
On Friday 09 April 2004 12:56 pm, Dimitris Kounalakis wrote: Hello, I need a special case and I am not sure it can exist with NAT (SNAT or DNAT) I have two lan networks with IP range : 1

 
150721354004_580160007835Jeffrey Laramie
On Friday 09 April 2004 11:07 pm, azeem ahmad wrote: hi alll i want to check the logs of iptables to check who is passing throught my machine. so plz tell me where r its logs and how can i che

 
157822244059_578660007390Antony Stone
Dear friends, As I am getting more confused about VPN masq., request your help on this. My local LAN is 10.35.0.0/24 My Linux box running red hat linux 9.0 with kernel 2.4.20-8. acting as the gat

 
149724734604_558860007411Luke Deryckx
yes, you need the pptp patch ive been in the same situation, and applying the patch made it work just fine.- see www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-5.html#ss5.6

 
108424364260_526760007115Manikandan
When I try to apply the patch, using netfilter CVS I am getting an error like Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] y Testing patch submitted/03_2.4.21.patch... Failed to patch copy

 
115529034785_531460007349azeem ahmad
On Friday 09 April 2004 12:56 pm, Dimitris Kounalakis wrote: Hello, I need a special case and I am not sure it can exist with NAT (SNAT or DNAT) I have two lan networks with IP range : 1

 
149322464484_549860007935Dave Barnum
On Sunday 25 April 2004 2:11 pm, Manikandan wrote: Somehow I managed to patch my kernel with pptp patch. But everytime when I load modules like ip_conntrack_pptp, ip_nat_pptp, I am getting an er

 
133326254159_539360007806Jeffrey Laramie
On Friday 09 April 2004 11:07 pm, azeem ahmad wrote: hi alll i want to check the logs of iptables to check who is passing throught my machine. so plz tell me where r its logs and how can i che

 
178329084278_538660007105Manikandan
Hi, Is there a patch for the IPSec masquerading for kernel 2.4.x. Basically, I need to allow multiple clients in a private lan access the (IPSec) VPN server through the internet. I hit upon this link

 
179825804541_505760007723Antony Stone
Dear friends, As I am getting more confused about VPN masq., request your help on this. My local LAN is 10.35.0.0/24 My Linux box running red hat linux 9.0 with kernel 2.4.20-8. acting as the gat

 
117220024625_595760007364Luke Deryckx
On Saturday 10 April 2004 6:18 am, Manikandan wrote: When I try to apply the patch, using netfilter CVS I am getting an error like Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] y T

 
130628104610_579060007657Luke Deryckx
yes, you need the pptp patch ive been in the same situation, and applying the patch made it work just fine.- see www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-5.html#ss5.6

 
172426414281_588360007692Antony Stone

 
168928174599_596860007094Manikandan
When I try to apply the patch, using netfilter CVS I am getting an error like Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] y Testing patch submitted/03_2.4.21.patch... Failed to patch copy

 
107230004674_561460007521Antony Stone
No, not using netfilter (unless you wanted to create a rule for each possible destination, just in case some packets got sent there (but then youd want to know what protocol was used, too, so

 
133622294524_596160007841Dave Barnum
On Sunday 25 April 2004 2:11 pm, Manikandan wrote: Somehow I managed to patch my kernel with pptp patch. But everytime when I load modules like ip_conntrack_pptp, ip_nat_pptp, I am getting an er

 
132524924651_593560007960Donovan J Edye
okay ... i decided to try them both ( the rule you posted and snort) to see ... ( one at a time :-) ) i just installed snort but i am stuck in the manual right now ... if it happens to have a snort c

 
159220064600_587460007634Manikandan
Hi, Is there a patch for the IPSec masquerading for kernel 2.4.x. Basically, I need to allow multiple clients in a private lan access the (IPSec) VPN server through the internet. I hit upon this link

 
156525784450_516460007653Roeland Moors
I have the following setup: CAPS = Device / Machine - ROUTER: WAN Address: xxxxxxxxx LAN Address: 192.168.40.1 - IPTABLES: 1 LAN Interface 192.168.40.5 (Gateway: 192.168.40.1) - PROXY: 1 LA

 
125926194652_593460007710Luke Deryckx
On Saturday 10 April 2004 6:18 am, Manikandan wrote: When I try to apply the patch, using netfilter CVS I am getting an error like Do you want to apply this patch [N/y/t/f/a/r/b/w/q/?] y T

 

 

home   |    register   |    login